Solid reasoning, compactly presented, on the Iraq campaign

Posted by bill | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 11-11-2003

Paul Craddick, blogging at Fragmenta Philosophica, packs a lot into these 800 words responding to the complaint “There never was a consistent rationale for war; the ‘case’ kept changing.”

It’s part three of an ongoing “Rethinking Iraq” series.

Related posts:

  1. Is this the military or not?
  2. Challenge yourself to be intellectually honest
  3. The case for war, brought to you by the Security Council of the United Nations.
  4. Who won the Cold War? Thoughts on the German election.
(0) Comments

Comments are closed.